Now comes the proof, the evidence as will be shown from Scribd and PDF Files. It will show from Point A to Point B how the corrupt city of Martinsville Commonwealth's Attorney Glen Andrew Hall had violated multiple Court orders asking for the discovery materials and Brady materials pursuant to Brady v. Maryland. This is contempt of court and is an offense which can include jail time to compel compliance. The Court should have compelled Glen Andrew Hall to have retained the evidence and turn it over to the defense's counsel. Court orders were not complied with by the Government of Virginia. May as well have a public online petition asking for the Judge to find Glen Andrew Hall guilty of contempt or charge him with contempt of court since the evidence is so obvious.
Two videos from TheStarChild2009 have revealed from Google's own Covid-19 worldwide statistics that countries and one State in this article with high vaccination rates have high covid-19 cases. The video had shown it preciously from their own online DATA reports.
hat Brian pays this corrupt (probably compromised) lawyer and the appeals were all thrown out. They did this probably to retaliate against Brian for his allegations insinuating that the judges of this Court may or may not have been blackmailed with child rape and murder as Attorney L. Lin Wood's vague tweets could be saying regarding any or certain number of politicians and judges, but no names have come out of which judges could have been compromised and blackmailed. That corrupt Court of Appeals didn't even respond to Brian's allegations, which that right there is suspicious, there needs to be investigations and removals from office. That is why special counsel is necessary to investigate every state and federal Judge who may have been blackmailed or threatened. Investigations may be needed to investigate every judge of this Court of Appeals, they act just as corrupt as the Federal Courts.
claims that Judges may be blackmailed with child rape and murder and using Attorney L. Lin Wood as the source. They had finally transferred two cases. One of them is the appeal for the Writ of Error Coram Nobis (Vobis, as Virginia may call it) and the other appeal was the case where Brian filed the letter accusing the Judges, any Judges involved in his cases may have raped children and were videotaped doing such acts and became targets of blackmail. This may be good as the Supreme Court of Virginia is involved with the State Bar of Virginia. If any Judges or maybe even the Commonwealth Attorney may be involved with child rape and murder, and thus being blackmailed, they need to be arrested and their licenses suspended and revoked. They should not revoke Lin Wood's attorney license as he is well within his right to expose potential blackmail operations of our Judicial Systems. Brian D. Hill is formerly the news reporter journalist of USWGO Alternative News.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News had gotten more bolder in filing a pleading in Federal U.S. Court of Appeals accusing Federal Judges of being blackmailed with child rape and murder, that Attorney L. Lin Wood is the source of this information. He has finally gotten more bolder as this is the third Court system of him bringing up the allegations of Judges being blackmailed with child rape and murder. First was the Federal Court in Roanoke, VA under the Chief Judge Francis Urbanski, second was a letter filed with the Court of Appeals of Virginia which is a State Appeals Court (not Federal), and the third is now this recent filing. Brian is asking for the Judicial Council of the Fourth Circuit to investigate the blackmail evidence, and subpoena Lin Wood to determine if Judge William Lindsey Osteen Junior and / or Thomas David Schroeder were ever targets of the blackmail scheme. If this is ever proven true, then Brian is entitled to either a New Trial in his Federal Criminal case or complete acquittal and removal from the Sex Offender Registry as a wrongfully convicted innocent man and was a victim of an partial corrupt Federal Judge who was blackmailed with child rape to prevent Brian from ever receiving a fair and impartial administration of justice. Essentially Brian would be deprived of Due Process of Law under the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
USWGO alternative news reporter Brian D. Hill's third petition in the U.S. Supreme Court has been docketed and filed. This is regarding the Supreme Court of Virginia throwing out Brian's appeal of his writ of habeas corpus petition being quickly denied because Brian was not in state custody at the time he filed his petition. Brian asserted that he has a constitutional right to prove factual innocence to his state charge and wrongful conviction. He said that decision by Virginia's highest court conflicts with the SCOTUS decisions that "actual innocence" can overcome any procedural bar or defect. It conflicts with well-settled issues of law and puts America backwards sense the Innocence Project had won a lot of cases of those actually innocent of crimes they were convicted on and were exonerated by DNA evidence.
The U.S. Supreme Court has made a grave error yesterday on February 22, 2021. They deprived an innocent man Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News of his Constitutional right to Trial by Jury but that right was given to a serial child pornographer named Andre Haymond. He gets his case heard before the Supreme Court, his case makes precedent in 2019, establishing that the serial child pornographer when he was caught twice with what appeared to be child porn, his appeal argued that he was deprived of his right to a jury trial. The SCOTUS agreed and overturned his case on that Constitutional ground. He has now become a serial child pornographer when he was found multiple times, and SCOTUS was sympathetic to him. SCOTUS was not sympathetic to an innocent man named Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News. They get to pick and choose who gets the Constitutional right to Trial by Jury when accused of a crime including a new charge of Violating Supervised Release. They get to choose based on a particular statute paragraph or subparagraph. What the Supreme Court has done to Brian is laughable at the face of true justice, and the hypocrisy.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news who had filed his petition with the highest Court in Virginia, had his petition for appeal refused by the writ panel in the Virginia Supreme Court for his state writ of habeas corpus petition after making his oral argument on Dec. 1, 2020. One day before New Years Eve, Brian had filed a petition for rehearing saying the writ panel had erred because Brian was actually innocent of his state charge of indecent exposure, that he should not be procedurally barred from being given relief in his criminal case because he is actually innocent, since the Martinsville Police erred in arresting Brian without proving that Brian was fully medically cleared. Brian was not medically cleared as Sovah Hospital did not test Brian for drugs, alcohol, or even gases in his blood the night he was found nude by police at night. The lab work was simply never done and then Brian was quickly arrested by Police and they never even took the time to find the man wearing the hoodie who threatened Brian to get naked or his mother would be murdered.
Brian D. Hill oral argument before Panel B of Virginia Supreme Court December 1, 2020 around 1:00PM.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news who was wrongfully convicted in federal and state courts, will speak before the Supreme Court of Virginia for oral argument. Lawyers will likely listen as well. This is for his state writ of habeas corpus to overturn his conviction on the basis of his actual innocence and ineffective assistance of counsel.