CORRUPT U.S. Supreme Court throws out Actual Innocence Appeal without Comment

Author: Stanley Bolten The corrupt U.S. Supreme Court threw out Brian's third Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. That is Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News. This appeal to SCOTUS was based upon the Virginia Supreme Court claiming that Brian has no right to overturn his wrongful conviction on the ground of ACTUAL... Continue Reading →

U.S. Supreme Court dockets Virginia Habeas Corpus appeal of Brian D. Hill

USWGO alternative news reporter Brian D. Hill's third petition in the U.S. Supreme Court has been docketed and filed. This is regarding the Supreme Court of Virginia throwing out Brian's appeal of his writ of habeas corpus petition being quickly denied because Brian was not in state custody at the time he filed his petition. Brian asserted that he has a constitutional right to prove factual innocence to his state charge and wrongful conviction. He said that decision by Virginia's highest court conflicts with the SCOTUS decisions that "actual innocence" can overcome any procedural bar or defect. It conflicts with well-settled issues of law and puts America backwards sense the Innocence Project had won a lot of cases of those actually innocent of crimes they were convicted on and were exonerated by DNA evidence.

Federal Courts pick and choose who gets TRIAL BY JURY: A serial child pornographer gets a JURY TRIAL right but not a former news journalist

The U.S. Supreme Court has made a grave error yesterday on February 22, 2021. They deprived an innocent man Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News of his Constitutional right to Trial by Jury but that right was given to a serial child pornographer named Andre Haymond. He gets his case heard before the Supreme Court, his case makes precedent in 2019, establishing that the serial child pornographer when he was caught twice with what appeared to be child porn, his appeal argued that he was deprived of his right to a jury trial. The SCOTUS agreed and overturned his case on that Constitutional ground. He has now become a serial child pornographer when he was found multiple times, and SCOTUS was sympathetic to him. SCOTUS was not sympathetic to an innocent man named Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News. They get to pick and choose who gets the Constitutional right to Trial by Jury when accused of a crime including a new charge of Violating Supervised Release. They get to choose based on a particular statute paragraph or subparagraph. What the Supreme Court has done to Brian is laughable at the face of true justice, and the hypocrisy.

No RIGHT to TRIAL BY JURY: U.S. Supreme Court throws out second Certiorari Petition in USWGO news Brian D. Hill’s criminal case

The U.S. Supreme Court had thrown out Brian's second petition requesting relief in his federal criminal case, that he was deprived of trial by jury. That is Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news. In this appeal case he had a lawyer named Edward Ryan Kennedy and was not done pro se, yet the Supreme Court treated the petition as if it doesn't even mean anything and isn't worthy of review. This finalizes the second supervised release violation against Brian D. Hill, and deprives him of the Constitutional right to a trial by jury. Yes this should scare any American. The Supreme Court had ruled last year that all Supervised Release violators are entitled to a trial by jury which gives them more Constitutional protections such as proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt or a conviction should not be made by the Jury.

U.S. Supreme Court dockets petition for rehearing in Brian’s Writ of Mandamus appeal; “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021”

The U.S. Supreme Court had finally docketed former USWGO alternative news reporter Brian D. Hill's petition for rehearing, after two months of filing in October 15, 2020, in mid-December the filing went live and is scheduled for the next judicial conference on January 8, 2021. This is in regards to Brian's writ of mandamus for DisHonorable Judge Thomas David Schroeder refusing to act upon pending uncontested motions for sanctions at the time.

USWGO News Brian Hill petitions Supreme Court for rehearing to rule on Fourth Circuit denying mandamus on Judge refusing to act on motions

Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news who was sued by Righthaven LLC in 2011 as documented by Reporters Without Borders, had filed a petition for rehearing in his Supreme Court case to undo the criminal-level frauds upon the court and perjury by compelling the DisHonorable Judge Thomas David Schroeder to act upon four uncontested pending motions to vacate all fraudulent begotten judgments in favor of the government. Uncontested means that under the rules those motions should have been granted as a matter of law, no discretion can normally be used without good reason. The law says if a motion had not been responded to by a certain due date, then the Government waives their right to respond and the motion is warranted to being granted, usually if it is well-grounded upon law. Brian contends that he is entitled as a matter of law to relief which means both probation violations he was found guilty of were based upon fraudulent facts and pretenses and thus are not sound judgments, this those judgments must be vacated and not in full force and effect. Then the last motion for sanctions asking for default judgment for Brian's actual innocence as a matter of law and for the government committing a repeated pattern of frauds upon the court.

Supreme Court throws out USWGO News Brian D. Hill’s case, Brian is writing the White House asking for FULL PARDON

Bad News! After all of the hard work that Brian D. Hill of USWGO alternative news had done proving fraud upon the court and his actual innocence, the Supreme Court had yesterday denied his petition for writ of certiorari. Thus allowing a CORRUPT federal judge to ignore motions and refuse to take action upon them which creates a permanent barrier against Brian's constitutional right to appeal an unfavorable decision. Now courts have the right to ignore motions completely which contradicts past case law precedent from the Virginia Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court. There was no opinion or comment for the denial of his petition. What is going on here? Have our courts been hijacked, infiltrated, threatened, blackmailed, family threatened, bribed????????? Well remember that John Roberts the Chief Justice may very well be involved with serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein even though Praying Medic disagrees.

Supreme Court Conference to determine whether Alternative News reporters can be DENIED ALL RELIEF after being framed with child porn; Today’s the day #Patriots #WWG1WGA #MAGA

The day has finally come as to whether alternative news reporters/journalists can be framed with child pornography, receive a federal criminal charge based upon shaky or fraudulent evidence, and whether or not they will be entirely deprived of due process by activist federal judges that may be blackmailed by the Deep State Swamp. The day has finally come when the Supreme Court is set for the next conference since June of 2020, where they will sit down and read through petitions to decide which one will be denied or granted. That is because what had happened to Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news can happen to YOU, by doing nothing about the wrongfully imprisoned activists it can happen to all of you if you choose to resist any political tyranny and try to resist the New-world-order agenda when it is not your agenda but the elite's agenda.

QAnon supporter Praying Medic @PrayingMedic was right: Justice John Roberts deserves Presumption of Innocence but so does ALL AMERICANS

Justice John Roberts is being accused of possibly being on the serial child molester Jeffrey Epstein flights on the Lolita Express due to a "John Roberts" name appearing two times on the flight log as well as "Bill Gates" Virginia Roberts, and "President William Jefferson Clinton" or Bill Clinton. However Praying Medic @prayingmedic a QAnon supporter is right in response to my last article. Justice John Roberts as well as ALL American citizens deserves the right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt when accused of committing a crime. That constitutional due process right does not just apply to Supreme Court justices. It applies to all.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑