Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news has filed his third U.S. Supreme Court petition for Writ of Certiorari asking SCOTUS to protect his actual innocence rights in his State criminal case. As well as filing a "Petition for Appeal" for the Court of Appeals of Virginia to undo a decision to throw out... Continue Reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court had thrown out Brian's second petition requesting relief in his federal criminal case, that he was deprived of trial by jury. That is Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news. In this appeal case he had a lawyer named Edward Ryan Kennedy and was not done pro se, yet the Supreme Court treated the petition as if it doesn't even mean anything and isn't worthy of review. This finalizes the second supervised release violation against Brian D. Hill, and deprives him of the Constitutional right to a trial by jury. Yes this should scare any American. The Supreme Court had ruled last year that all Supervised Release violators are entitled to a trial by jury which gives them more Constitutional protections such as proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt or a conviction should not be made by the Jury.
The U.S. Supreme Court had finally docketed former USWGO alternative news reporter Brian D. Hill's petition for rehearing, after two months of filing in October 15, 2020, in mid-December the filing went live and is scheduled for the next judicial conference on January 8, 2021. This is in regards to Brian's writ of mandamus for DisHonorable Judge Thomas David Schroeder refusing to act upon pending uncontested motions for sanctions at the time.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news who was sued by Righthaven LLC in 2011 as documented by Reporters Without Borders, had filed a petition for rehearing in his Supreme Court case to undo the criminal-level frauds upon the court and perjury by compelling the DisHonorable Judge Thomas David Schroeder to act upon four uncontested pending motions to vacate all fraudulent begotten judgments in favor of the government. Uncontested means that under the rules those motions should have been granted as a matter of law, no discretion can normally be used without good reason. The law says if a motion had not been responded to by a certain due date, then the Government waives their right to respond and the motion is warranted to being granted, usually if it is well-grounded upon law. Brian contends that he is entitled as a matter of law to relief which means both probation violations he was found guilty of were based upon fraudulent facts and pretenses and thus are not sound judgments, this those judgments must be vacated and not in full force and effect. Then the last motion for sanctions asking for default judgment for Brian's actual innocence as a matter of law and for the government committing a repeated pattern of frauds upon the court.
Bad News! After all of the hard work that Brian D. Hill of USWGO alternative news had done proving fraud upon the court and his actual innocence, the Supreme Court had yesterday denied his petition for writ of certiorari. Thus allowing a CORRUPT federal judge to ignore motions and refuse to take action upon them which creates a permanent barrier against Brian's constitutional right to appeal an unfavorable decision. Now courts have the right to ignore motions completely which contradicts past case law precedent from the Virginia Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court. There was no opinion or comment for the denial of his petition. What is going on here? Have our courts been hijacked, infiltrated, threatened, blackmailed, family threatened, bribed????????? Well remember that John Roberts the Chief Justice may very well be involved with serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein even though Praying Medic disagrees.
The day has finally come as to whether alternative news reporters/journalists can be framed with child pornography, receive a federal criminal charge based upon shaky or fraudulent evidence, and whether or not they will be entirely deprived of due process by activist federal judges that may be blackmailed by the Deep State Swamp. The day has finally come when the Supreme Court is set for the next conference since June of 2020, where they will sit down and read through petitions to decide which one will be denied or granted. That is because what had happened to Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news can happen to YOU, by doing nothing about the wrongfully imprisoned activists it can happen to all of you if you choose to resist any political tyranny and try to resist the New-world-order agenda when it is not your agenda but the elite's agenda.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news had filed a letter to Justice Clarence Thomas by 24-hour express mailing urging him to grant his petition for writ of certiorari. Writ of certiorari is an order to review over the decision of a lower court and possibly mandate a change in that lower court decision through order and remand. This is again in regards to his federal criminal case where Brian had accused the federal prosecutor Anand Prakash Ramaswamy of knowingly defrauding the court, that the fraud and coercion by his own court appointed lawyers was used to scare and coerce him into falsely pleading guilty to his charge. He had also sent a letter a few months ago to Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Brian explained why he supported QAnon and about him being an ally of QAnon.
Brian D. Hill formerly of USWGO alternative news had mailed out a letter to Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, a associate Justice who was appointed to the bench by U.S. President Donald John Trump in 2018. Brian had asked this Justice under the 'rule of 4' to consider his petition for writ of certiorari, and to drain the swamp as Donald Trump instructed people to do.
There are the top seven reasons why the Supreme Court of the United States of America should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of "Brian David Hill v. United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina" [originally entitled "In re: Brian David Hill; mandamus relief].
by Laurie Azgard The SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the U.S.] clerks have now distributed the case of "Brian David Hill v. United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina" to the conference which is dated for September 29, 2020 where the Justices will decide which cases to grant writs of certiorari and... Continue Reading →