USWGO News Brian D. Hill files Trio of U.S. Supreme Court petitions to Nullify Criminal Conviction; curtail Fraud on the Court; asking to impose Mandate/Prohibition on Autonomous Federal Courts ignoring Actual Innocence Exception to Anti-Terrorism AEDPA

Update article: USWGO News Brian D. Hill’s Trio of U.S. Supreme Court petitions docketed, response deadlines set for November 22, 2021; Judge SSchroeder to have to respond to Brian’s assertions of them bucking the Supreme Court – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News; Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alt. News files EMERGENCY MOTIONS in U.S. Supreme Court; asking for Leave of Court until Corrupt Federal Judges and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar responds or files opposition briefs – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News

Update article: Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alt News files Judicial Complaint against Judges for Discrimination, again asserts possibly Blackmail; complaint against Judge Thomas David SSchroeder and William Lindsey Osteen Junior – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News and U.S. Solicitor General waives right to respond to all of Brian’s trio Supreme Court petitions which may be an attempt to push for the Supreme Court to toss them all out – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News

Update connected articles: Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Greensboro, NC refuses to file Letter regarding Lin Wood tweets about child rape and murder – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News; Brian D. Hill files trio letters with U.S. Supreme Court requesting that the U.S. Government respond for its fraud; that U.S. Chief Judge SSchroeder and U.S. Judge Osteen Junior answer for ignoring the laws – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News; Email to U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar: “This has to come to a resolution., In Re: Brian David Hill; you should respond or file opposition brief” – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News

Note: NULLIFICATION IS THE ANSWER, See article about the new Declaration of Independence. Brian is asking for nullification of the Corrupt Judge orders of his corrupt Court. Nullification is the answer to tyrannical orders, tyrannical decrees, and tyrannical unconstitutional actions. Like Marbury v. Madison, any decision or legal action which is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.

Author: Stanley Bolten

Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News (after he was framed on August 28, 2012 in the Town of Mayodan) has filed three/trio Petitions within the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out the null and void criminal judgments in Brian’s Federal criminal case. Not just that but is pushing the SCOTUS to curtail the U.S. Attorney’s repeated pattern of fraud on the court under it’s leading assistant U.S. Attorney Anand Prakash Ramaswamy of the Middle District of North Carolina.

See the documents for yourself and what is exactly being filed in the U.S. Supreme Court. This is being filed by UPS and USPS mail carriers. All is included in this article for release to the public, released by Brian’s family for the purposes of educating the American people about their judicial system. Proper void redactions in place in the mailing label printout records to release copies of the mailing label records while in compliance with the USPS postal regulations and these document releases here are fully protected under the First Amendment of Freedom of Press; Freedom of Speech:

Documents:
First Petition for Writ of Certiorari of the Trio Petitions (appendix included)
Second Petition for Writ of Certiorari of the Trio Petitions (appendix included)
Third Petition for Writs of Mandamus or Prohibition of the Trio Petitions (appendix included)
Certificate of compliance for First Petition
Certificate of compliance for Second Petition
Certificate of compliance for Third Petition
Affidavit of Service for First Petition
Affidavit of Service for Second Petition
Affidavit of Service for Third Petition
Letter to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court regarding Mandamus Petition
USPS mailing record of proof of mailing to Assistant U.S. Attorneys
USPS mailing record of proof of mailing to U.S. District Court Clerk
USPS mailing record of proof of mailing to Clerk of Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
USPS mailing record of proof of mailing to U.S. Solicitor General
UPS mailing record of proof of mailing to the U.S. Supreme Court
Xfinity Connect UPS Access Point Package Receipt Printout – Proof of filing by mail
Update Document Uploads (October 19, 2021 1:12AM):
Proof of Receipt by U.S. Attorney Office
What was mailed to U.S. Attorney Office
Proof of Receipt by U.S. District Court
What was mailed to U.S. District Court
Update Document Uploads (October 20, 2021 10:54PM):
Docket Sheet of Fourth Circuit confirming receipt of Mandamus Petition – See the last page where it mentions: “DOCUMENT – Supreme Court Mandamus – by Brian David Hill. [1001040622] [20-7737] JSN [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:41 PM]”
Document filed in Fourth Circuit closed appeal case confirming receipt of Mandamus Petition(see last two pages of document mentioning political statements about Jeffrey Epstein, and judges and officials being blackmailed). Brian is making it clear to the Fourth Circuit with his written statements to them that he knows Judges are being blackmailed. The Clerk made very well sure that Brian’s written statements on the envelope were included in the document and scanned in color with the QAnon symbol and USWGO symbol. Pretty sure Ramaswamy has a copy of this filing as well through the CM/ECF system. Things are getting interesting. Page 131 says: “Research Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, L. Lin Wood on officials/judges blackmailed”

An Anti-Terrorism law is being used against Brian in the Fourth Circuit, the corrupt U.S. Court of Appeals in either proclaiming that there is no actual innocence exception or omitting the actual innocence exception ruled upon by the U.S. Supreme Court. Lower Courts are making rulings a year or longer after SCOTUS’s last case law ruling that the Anti-Terrorism law shall abate a actual innocence claim to a Federal or State criminal conviction in a Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus through the Section 2255/2254 Motions. The Anti-Terrorism law being used against Brian Hill is known as the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act in the 1990s. This law was created by using the excuse of a crisis involving the bombing of a Federal Building in Oklahoma, by Timothy McVeigh where he bombed a Federal Building and killed even children. That single act of terrorism was used to bar all criminal defendants from getting any kind of relief from a criminal conviction if a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed after one year of the final conviction. That anti-terrorism law is being directly used against Brian Hill and had held him hostage to a corrupt Federal Judge with fraudulent begotten criminal judgments. The Federal Courts are ignoring the Supreme Court when they want to ignore it and when they choose to ignore it. These Courts are acting autonomously against the law. Federal Courts are acting like CHOP or CHAZ. CHAZ is titled the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. Just like our Federal Courts are creating autonomous law directly contrary to law and contrary to the Supreme Court. THIS IS DANGEROUS in a constitutional republic. Even the Federal Courts have to equally enforce the laws when placed under reverse incorporation. So even the Feds must enforce all rules and laws equally on everybody otherwise that law is being applied unconstitutionally, illegal criminal convictions, illegal judgments. Null and void. The Feds cannot discriminate against Brian, regardless of whether each individual Judge personally feels that Brian may be guilty or not, meanwhile while ignoring evidence and witnesses. These judges do not have the time to review over pages of discovery evidence material, listen to the audio recordings, watch any videos filed. Usually they may ask their law clerks to do all of that for them and then make a recommendation upon their findings if need be, but still Judges have to at least review over the evidence submitted to them so that they fully understand what is being prosecuted and what is being defended against.

Judge Schroeder acts like Brian was guilty even though he was not the original sentencing Judge, but was William Lindsey Osteen Junior. Judge Schroeder was never even involved with the Grand Jury proceedings against Brian. So for Judge Schroeder to feel that Brian is guilty without ever reviewing over the original indictment evidence is childish, he just believes or wants to believe in the fraud by the Federal Prosecutor: Anand Prakash Ramaswamy. Even at the time when Brian falsely plead guilty, he did inform the Judge Osteen under oath or affirmation that he had not been taken care of medically in the jails, and had to plead guilty falsely to get out of jail where he could get better access to medical treatments. He was at risk of coma, kidney damage, eye damage, nerve damage, diabetic seizure, and death had he not falsely plead guilty. Judge Schroeder refuses to acknowledge any of it because it would create distrust in the U.S. Marshals to ensure that every criminal defendant is being well taken care of medically without issues. If the Federal Court even acknowledges that Brian was tortured into falsely pleading guilty, then many will also have to be set free as well. They do not want many to be freed from jails on those technicalities. Still, Brian was the former news reporter of USWGO Alternative News. He has never raped, he has never murdered. He has never molested. He has never been charged with assault. So should Brian be acquitted on a mere technicality when he was framed and tortured into falsely plead guilty?????

McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, (2013) (“The Court has applied this “fundamental miscarriage of justice exception” to overcome various procedural defaults, including, as most relevant here, failure to observe state procedural rules, such as filing deadlines. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 750, 111 S. Ct. 2546, 115 L. Ed. 2d 640. The exception, the Court’s decisions bear out, survived AEDPA’s passage. See , e.g., Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 558, 118 S. Ct. 1489, 140 L. Ed. 2d 728; House, 547 U.S., at 537-538, 126 S. Ct. 2064, 165 L. Ed. 2d 1. These decisions “see[k] to balance the societal interests in finality, comity, and conservation of scarce judicial resources with the individual interest in justice that arises in the extraordinary case.” Schlup, 513 U.S., at 324, 115 S. Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed. 2d 808. Sensitivity to the injustice of incarcerating an innocent individual should not abate when the impediment is AEDPA’s statute of limitations. Pp. 391-394, 185 L. Ed. 2d, at 1030-1031.”)

From page 26 (page 34 in the PDF document) of Brian’s Second trio petition for Writ of Certiorari

See the video of Brian being held hostage and was tortured into falsely pleading guilty, similar to the misconduct by jail officials in Washington, DC against the J6 aka January 6 protesters and few violent people while the rest were peaceful but also arrested wrongfully when those folks were peacefully there with just a few bad apples.

See articles: Federal Appeals Court IGNORES THE LAW, throws out Habeas Corpus Appeal and Hazel Atlas Fraud Motions Appeal – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia (the Fourth Circuit) is repeatedly disobeying the well grounded Constitutional protections by the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Those arguments are being brought up in the Trio of SCOTUS petitions being filed by Mr. Hill.

If the Mandamus petition is ever granted by SCOTUS, then the criminal conviction and supervised release violation convictions may all be nullified. All decisions that were against Brian Hill and favorable to the Federal Prosecution may all be nullified. If the first Petition for Writ of Certiorari is ever granted, then this can reverse the bad decision by tyrant Judge Schroeder denying all uncontested motions by falsely labeling them as meritless and frivolous. If the second Petition for Writ of Certiorari is ever granted, then this can force the U.S. Court of Appeals to grant a “certificate of appealability” and allow the Actual Innocence exception to be forced upon the Fourth Circuit’s corrupt and outdated/autonomous case law forbidding the actual innocence exception. To the contrary, all Appellate Courts are supposed to follow the U.S. Supreme Court. Judge Schroeder and the Fourth Circuit had no authority to override the Supreme Court. They had no right to override McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, (2013).

The Federal Court of Appeals and Federal Courts are ignoring the following essential Constitutional rights guaranteed by the U.S. Supreme Court; decisions of SCOTUS being ignored by lower inferior District and Appellate Courts:

  1. The Constitutional right to a jury trial (trial by jury) in all Supervised Release violation charges and revocation proceedings as those judgments can lead to imprisonment which may include the right of a jury to possibly even decide the sentence of criminal defendants. See articles: Federal Courts pick and choose who gets TRIAL BY JURY: A serial child pornographer gets a JURY TRIAL right but not a former news journalist – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News; No RIGHT to TRIAL BY JURY: U.S. Supreme Court throws out second Certiorari Petition in USWGO news Brian D. Hill’s criminal case – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
  2. The Constitutional right of a criminal defendant to have his criminal conviction overturned on actual innocence which is proven factual innocence.
  3. The Constitutional inherit or implied powers of all Federal Courts under the All Writs Act. Although these inherit powers may simply be inherently Constitutional as well as a statute should not be required to fix fraud being perpetuated on the court. Such as the right to correct errors upon its own record inherently or by request for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. So this power may be more of the Constitutional power of actions inside of the Court in its own respect. See case law of Chambers v. NASCO, Inc.

Those are some JPG converted pages from the third of the trio SCOTUS petitions. This one really hammers the U.S. District Court for all of the abuses of authority, abuses of power, and abuses of discretion. Usually only extraordinary relief petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court are accepted when there is no other recourse when pretty much every other remedy attempt had been exhausted with no avail.

This petition has been filed on October 11, 2021, through the UPS because the UPS is not closed on Columbus day unlike the U.S. Postal Service. Brian’s family is fully behind Brian and are ready to testify if need be. This article is produced thanks to Brian’s family for releasing these very important documents. They are all being published including the postal labels with the VOID markings on it so that the records are available online in case of any assassination attempts against Brian. In cases of any potential police raid or arrest or retaliation campaign by the corrupt Federal Judges or corrupt Federal Prosecutors. In case any of the above happens to Brian or his family, these documents must be released to the general public, to be made public and archived on the Wayback Machine and other platforms to protect Brian and his family from any further persecution.

See the photos regarding Brian and his box of papers being mailed out to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Says right on the box, JUSTICEFORUSWGO.WORDPRESS.COM – GOD – JESUS – COUNTRY – JUSTICE – FREEDOM – LIBERTY – NO CORRUPTION

That is perfect, when the U.S. Supreme Court and it’s Court Security sees those words on the box. The U.S. Department of InJustice is going to be so pissed off. I can totally see that with what was posted in this picture 🙂 MAGA 2020 2022 2024 Justice for ALL

32 thoughts on “USWGO News Brian D. Hill files Trio of U.S. Supreme Court petitions to Nullify Criminal Conviction; curtail Fraud on the Court; asking to impose Mandate/Prohibition on Autonomous Federal Courts ignoring Actual Innocence Exception to Anti-Terrorism AEDPA

Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: