USWGO news Brian Hill had filed a new 2255 Motion ground: “FRAUD upon the court” for his federal case

by Laurie Azgard

Brian D. Hill of USWGO alternative news had filed a motion to amend to his 2255 motion to include a new ground of “fraud upon the court”, after the cowardly U.S. magistrate judge Joe Webster had recommending dismissal of Brian’s 2255 motion. They won’t even give Brian a chance to prove his actual innocence, they won’t give him an opportunity to show any factual innocence. That totally is cruel and unusual punishment and violates his right to the privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus which was not supposed to be suspended except in “Cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it”. They are suspending habeas corpus in any or all federal criminal convictions whether somebody is innocent or guilty. The Constitution is misinterpreted by our corrupt federal courts and corrupt federal judges towing the line of the new-world-order globalists.

uswgo-brian-d-hill-2255-motion-fraud-upon-court-actual-innocence-justice-news-laurie-azgard

Asserting the issue of fraud upon the court in any court is not subject to a statute of limitations, and entitles Brian to prove his actual innocence or even go as far as giving Brian default judgment in his favor. Plenty of case law backing Brian’s claims about fraud on the court. There are blogs that talk about case law in reference to fraud upon the court and void judgments.

See his motion on Courtlistener or even this blog.

Brian is asserting that “fraud upon the court” and his actual innocence go together like a horse and carriage, because when the U.S. attorney is using any fraudulent evidence or any fraudulent facts concerning his guilt, that he is not guilty at all and deserves acquittal. That does make sense when you have to be truthful in a court of law. In fact the rules, the law, and inherit powers of a court mandate that a party and the party’s attorney be truthful in any filings or verbal statements made before a court. Any party that is lying before the court or attempts to deceive a court can be sanctioned by the other party, and is at a higher risk of losing their merits and losing their case. In fact if you lie before a court, your entire position can be laughed out of court. So why is the U.S. attorney office not being laughed out of court for lying, subornation of perjury, false facts, and defamation of character? Why is the U.S. district court protecting Anand Prakash Ramaswamy?

In fact it is well known on record by checking the docket sheet or Courtlistener, that the Government counsel thugs did not file any objection to the motions asking for sanctions for fraud upon the court.

MOTION entitled “Motion for Sanctions and to Vacate Judgment in Plaintiff’s/Respondent’s Favor” “Motion and Brief/Memorandum of Law in Support of Requesting the Honorable Court in this case Vacate Fraudulent Begotten Judgment or Judgments” filed by BRIAN DAVID HILL. Response to Motion due by 10/25/2019. (Attachments: # (1) Supplement 1, # (2) Supplement 2, # (3) Exhibit 1, # (4) Exhibit 2, # (5) Envelope – Front and Back) (Civil Case number: 17CV1036) (Garland, Leah)

MOTION entitled “Petitioner’s Second Motion for Sanctions and to Vacate Judgment that was in Plaintiff’s/Respondent’s Favor; Motion and Brief/Memorandum of Law in support of Requesting the Honorable Court in this case Vacate Fraudulent begotten Judgment or Judgments” filed by BRIAN DAVID HILL. Response to Motion due by 11/5/2019. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Supplement 1, # (4) Supplement 2, # (5) Supplement 3, # (6) Supplement 4, # (7) Envelope – Front and Back) (Garland, Leah)

So means that no responses have been filed by the U.S. attorney staff, and were given three weeks to respond to those motions. They are okay with frauds, they are okay with false evidence being used against Brian. Brian is entitled to his criminal conviction being overturned. That is a matter of law and case law. If the other party wins a case through fraud, then Brian has a right of course to ask that the judgment against him be overturned on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: